Kanak Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18285 of 2025 ====================================================== Kanak Kumari, aged about 56 years, female, D/o of Late Baleshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of Ward No.- 11, Salempur, P.O. and P.S.- Barh, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, at Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Urban Development, Bihar at Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Barh, Patna.

5.

The Nagar Parishad, Barh through its Executive Officer. 6.

The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Barh, Patna. 7.

Jagannathan High School, Barh, through its Principal at Barh, Patna. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mrs. Sonali Priya, Advocate Mr. Sanchay Srivastava, Advocate Mr. Sushant Srivastava, Advocate Mr. Ashish Kumar Palit, Advocate For the Respondents :

Mr. P.K. Shahi, Advocate General ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 27-11-2025 In the instant petition, the petitioner, prays for the following relief/s:- "I. For issuance of an appropriate writ order(s)/ direction(s) in the nature of mandamus for a direction to the concerned respondents particularly to the respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6 to stop the illegal encroachment on the land of the playground/ park, belonging to Jagarnath High

Patna High Court CWJC No.18285 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 2/2 School, Barh and immediately handover the peaceful physical possession of the said land on which the playground/park of the school exists to the management of the said School to be utilized by the Students of the said school for their education and recreation activities.

II. And for issuance of any other relief or relief(s) for which the petitioner is entitled for."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the present application with the liberty to approach before the competent authority, if so advised.

3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

4. This writ application stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

(Sudhir Singh, ACJ) (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J.) Gaurav Kumar, Ibrar/- U