← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./72887/2019bail granted

Sri Bhagwan Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2020-03-05Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72887 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2018 Thana- SIMRI District- Buxar ====================================================== Sri Bhagwan Thakur, Son of Late Dhamla Thakur @ Late Ghamla Thakur Resident of Village - Manikpur, P.S.- Simri, Distt - Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Pradhan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anant Kumar 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Simri (T.R.H.O.P.) P.S. Case No. 102 of 2018, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The accusation is that in the evening of 09.05.2018, on hearing the Hullah, Amit Rai, son of the informant, Vinda Devi, came out from the house and proceeded towards that direction. At that time, villager, Bhagwan Thakur (petitioner) shot fire through pistol at the belly of her son, Amit Rai with intention to kill him then he fell down. Thereafter, her villagers, Upendra Thakur having double barrel gun, Jitendra Thakur

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72887 of 2019(3) dt.05-03-2020 2/3 having rifle, Yogesh Thakur and Ankit Thakur having country made pistol and Bhagwan Thakur (petitioner) having katta along with 20 to 25 unknown variously armed with weapons started firing. In the meantime, Bablu Pandey, Anil Pandey, Sunil Pandey and others also reached there and started counter firing, in which, Sunil Pandey and her son, Amit Kumar, sustained firearm injury. Thereafter, her son, Amit Kumar was rushed to the hospital, where treatment is going on.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in fact, due to playing of cricket quarrel took place, in which, firing started from both sides, in which, Sunil Pandey, sustained injury and died, regarding which, Simri P.S. Case No. 101 of 2018 is also instituted against the family members of the informant. Further submission is that, in fact, the deceased, Sunil Pandey, Bhagina of the petitioner, used to reside at the house of the petitioner and he died in the firing of informant's side.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72887 of 2019(3) dt.05-03-2020 3/3 connection with Simri (T.R.H.O.P.) P.S. Case No. 102 of 2018. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T