Sujit Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80373 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2021 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== Sujit Sah, S/O Late Jaynarayan Sah, Resident of village- Itwa Bichala Tola, P.S- Pachrukhi, Dist.- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Kumari Anupam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-04-2025 Heard Ms. Kumari Anupam learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with S.T. No. 294 of 2022 arising out of Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 199 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under Section 307, 326, 302, 325, 34 and 216A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the son of the informant has gone to Maharajganj Bazar with one Ashraf Ansari. While he was returning home, certain miscreants fired at him. He died during treatment.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80373 of 2024(5) dt.03-04-2025 2/2 case. It has further been submitted that the F.I.R. was lodged against unknown miscreants. During course of investigation, this petitioner has given his confessional statement. Save and except the confessional statement, nothing is against him. In this case according to the F.I.R., Ashraf Ansari was accompanying the deceased. Ashraf Ansari has given his statement during investigation and he has not named anybody. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 27.01.2022.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court of Additional Sessions Judge 9th, Siwan in connection with S.T. No. 294 of 2022 arising out of Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 199 of 2021.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T