Akhilesh Singh @ Akhilesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74906 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Akhilesh Singh @ Akhilesh Kumar Son of Devnarayan Prasad Resident of Village- Telari, Ps- Rupau, Dist- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Shilpi Keshri, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nawada Cyber P.S. Case No. 110/2025, registered for the offence under Sections 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 111, 317(5) and 61(2) of the BNS and Sections 66, 66(B), 66(C),66(D) of the I.T. Act.

3. The accused/petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 16.07.2025.

4. As per FIR, on suspicion a raid was conducted by the informant, who is Sub-inspector of Cyber Police Station Nawada, where during raid several electronic gadgets i.e. mobile phone, ATM card, Aadhar card, passbooks of different banks said to be recovered and a suspicion was raised that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74906 of 2025(2) dt.10-11-2025 2/3 apprehended co-accused persons were involved in cyber fraud.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the name of petitioner transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, namely, Manish and Sudhanshu during course of investigation, where in furtherance of which no incriminating material appears to be recovered from this petitioner, which may suggest his involvement prima facie with crime in question. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that investigation of this case is already completed, for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. Petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

6. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

7. Considering the aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of fact as prima facie nothing incriminating appears recovered from possession of this petitioner to suggest his involvement with alleged crime in question, coupled with the fact that investigation of this case is already completed, where petitioner remains in custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74906 of 2025(2) dt.10-11-2025 3/3 16.07.2025, accordingly, petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Nawada Cyber P.S. Case No. 110/2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Nawada/concerned Court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C./Section 480(3) of BNSS.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) veena/- U T