← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74972/2025bail rejected

Ajeet Yadav @ Vikal Kumar @ Vikrant Kumar @ Vikant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-04Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74972 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2023 Thana- BISHANPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Ajeet Yadav @ Vikal Kumar @ Vikrant Kumar @ Vikant Kumar S/O Prem Lal Yadav R/o Village- Bharaul, P.s.- Bishanpur, Dist.- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Baidyanath Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and later on, Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added.

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner fired on the head of brother of informant, namely Mithilesh Yadav, who died during course of treatment.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, due to previous enmity, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted and petitioner is in custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74972 of 2025(2) dt.04-11-2025 2/2 03.03.2025. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he fired on the head of Mithilesh Yadav as a result of which he died during course of treatment.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that petitioner is the main assailant of the deceased, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T