Prakash Sahni @ Parkash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74942 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2020 Thana- LALIT NARAYAN UNIVERSITY District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

PRAKASH SAHNI @ PARKASH KUMAR S/O LATE BHUSHAN SAHNI @ HALKHORI SHANI Resident of village- Azam Nagar, P.S.- L.N.M. University, District- Darbhanga.

2.

PARMOD SAHNI @ PRAMOD KUMAR S/O LATE NARAYAN SAHNI Resident of village- Azam Nagar, P.S.- L.N.M. University, DistrictDarbhanga. 3.

PARAKASH SAHNI @ PRAKASH SAHNI S/O LATE RAMBILASH SAHNI Resident of village- Bhigo, P.S.- Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga. 4.

SANNY KUMAR @ SANNY SAHNI S/O RUDAL SAHNI Resident of village- Mohammadpur, P.S.- Kamtaul, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shambhu Nath Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 448, 385, 504, 506, 308, 323, 354, 337, 338 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.

As per the prosecution case, petitioners in association with other co-accused persons have assaulted the informant and his family members.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74942 of 2022(2) dt.04-02-2023 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. He submits that nobody was injured in this case which is clear from the impugned order itself. He further submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application. Learned APP for the State opposes for prayer for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with L.N.M.U. P.S. Case No.91/2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T