Parbhans Rajbhar @ Prabhans Rajbhar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75375 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2025 Thana- RAJPUR District- Buxar ====================================================== Parbhans Rajbhar @ Prabhans Rajbhar S/o Shiv Shankar Rajbhar R/o vill - Khatiba, P.S.- Itarhi, Distt.- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amit Kumar Pandey, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rajpur P.S. Case No. 310 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per prosecution case, the police has recovered total 510.12 liters of illicit foreign liquor from the pick-up. The petitioner was arrested on the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion. He further submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75375 of 2025(3) dt.10-11-2025 2/3 nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern either with the alleged vehicle or the seized liquor. The petitioner is not the owner of the alleged vehicle. The petitioner has also no concern with the other co-accused persons. The petitioner is alleged to be the driver of the alleged vehicle. The petitioner has never indulged either in manufacturing or trading of the illicit liquor. There is a non-compliance of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. which creates a serious doubt in the prosecution case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is languishing in judicial custody since 13.09.2025 without any rhymes or reason.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75375 of 2025(3) dt.10-11-2025 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Rajpur P.S. Case No. 310 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) rishi/- U T