Sujit Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 77852 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2021 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== Sujit Sah, S/o- Late Jaynarayan Sah, Resident of village- Itwa Bichala Tola, PS- Pachrukhi Dist- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Kumari Anupam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-04-2025 Heard Ms. Kumari Anupam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with S.T. No. 782 of 2022 arising out of Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 200 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that Ramjeet Yadav, Harendra Yadav, Nilesh Yadav, Ajeet Yadav and Sujeet Yadav were on litigating terms with the informant. They were accused in a case of 307 of the I.P.C. They were pressurizing the informant to compromise the case otherwise she will have to face dire consequences. It has further been alleged that Dharamnath Yadav, Krishna Yadav and Manoj Yadav have killed the husband of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 77852 of 2024(4) dt.03-04-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is not named in this case. His name has surfaced in a confessional statement in other case wherein he has stated that he was involved in this case. There is nothing except the confessional statement in other case against the petitioner. He is languishing in judicial custody since 13.04.2022.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court of Additional Sessions Judge 2nd, Siwan in connection with S.T. No. 782 of 2022 arising out of Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 200 of 2021.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T