Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76092/2025dismissed

Vinod Kumar @ Sudhu @ Binod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-11Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76092 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2023 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Vinod Kumar @ Sudhu @ Binod Kumar S/O Late Sheshnath Sah R/O Village- Dwardevi Chowk, P.S- Bettiah (Town), Distt.- West Champaran. Present Address- Khiriya Ghat, P.S- Bairiya, Distt.- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

X W/O Akhilesh Yadav R/O Village- Khiriya Ghat, Ward No. 3, P.SBairiya, Distt.- West Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard the parties.

2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with POCSO Case No. 134 of 2024 arising out of Bairiya P.S. Case No. 289 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 3(a) and 3(e) of the POCSO Act. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 21.03.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4452 of 2024 which reads as under:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bairiya P.S. Case No. 289 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 3(a)/3(c)

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76092 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 of the POCSO Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have sodomized a seven year old boy.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is in jail since 25.09.2023.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.

3. The learned counsel for the victim has submitted all the witnesses have been examined in the trial.

4. In view of the fact that all the witnesses have been examined in the trial, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U