Anil Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67507 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2019 Thana- TANKUPPA District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Anil Paswan, aged about 27 years, Male, Son of Late Krishna Paswan 2.

Ranjan Kumar, aged about 28 years, Male, Son of Naresh Paswan @ Naresh Singh, both resident of Village-Beldar Bigha, Police Station-Tankuppa, District-Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kunwar Narayan Jamuar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No.1, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Tankuppa P.S. Case No. 91 of 2019 registered for the offences under Sections 30(A), 38(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are in jail custody since 29.08.2019 and the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. There is no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67507 of 2019(2) dt.04-11-2019 2/2 bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Tankuppa P.S. Case No. 91 of 2019, subject to the following conditions :

(1) One of the bairlors will be their own blood relatives, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or their wife.

(2) The petitioners shall not indulge themselves in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioners shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded and make themselves available and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Nasimul/- U T