Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69837 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-407 Year-2019 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== Suraj Kumar Son of Shyam Nand Sah Resident of Village-Belauri, P.S.- Muffasil (Ranipatra), District-Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dr. Bidhu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3.

26-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sadar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 407 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 406, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Specific allegation of theft of maize weighing about 31635 kg amount to Rs. 7,00,000/- (seven lacs), which were loaded in truck, is against driver and owner of truck and since petitioner is brother of owner of said truck, on suspicion, he has also been implicated in this case. Petitioner has got no concern with the affairs of his brother and driver of the truck. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as nature of accusation, in the event of his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69837 of 2019(3) dt.26-02-2020 2/2 arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Purnea in connection with Sadar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 407 of 2019 on the following conditions:

"(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail."

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T