Keshav Rai @ Keshav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77488 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-509 Year-2023 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali ====================================================== Keshav Rai @ Keshav Kumar S/O Saroj Rai @ Saroj Kumar @ Suresh Rai Resident of Village - Belka, P. S -Vaishali ,District - Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shyameshwar Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 447, 448, 354, 307, 504/34 of the IPC and under Section 27 of the Arms Act in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No.509 of 2023.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of two cases and is alleged to have fired at the injured causing injury on his arms. It is further submitted that on account of dispute relating to land an altercation had taken place in which both sides assaulted each other and from side of the petitioner Vaishali P.S. Case No.519 of 2023 dated 27.11.2023 was instituted against the side of the informant and others.
4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77488 of 2024(2) dt.18-01-2025 2/2 informant opposes the regular bail application and submits that the specific allegation against this petitioner and Manoj Kumar of causing firearm injury to the injured and the injured also received two gun shot injury. It is further submitted that even if any dispute relating to land had existed, in that event, the petitioner was not entitled to fire at the informant causing firearm injury.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant, the Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail for the present, accordingly, regular bail application is rejected. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T