Dilkhush Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73841 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2025 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria ====================================================== Dilkhush Kumar S/o Ranjit Chaudhari R/o Village- Dumri, Ward No. 2, P.S.- Beldaur, District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Veena Devi W/o Manchan Sahni R/o Village- Dumri, Ward No. 2, P.S.- Beldaur, District- Khagaria ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-11-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner along with his friend came to her house in her absence when her daughter aged about 17 tears was alone and kidnapped her on false promise of marriage. Further, the victim took Rs.35,000/- and ornaments Rs.45,000/- along with herself.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73841 of 2025(2) dt.18-11-2025 2/3
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner and the victim were in love and they eloped. It is also submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that informant alleges that when victim fled from the house, she took an amount of Rs.35,000/- along with ornaments which amply demonstrates that she was not kidnapped rather on her own volition she eloped with the petitioner. It is also submitted that victim has come back and her statement was recorded under Section 183 BNSS wherein she has not supported the case of the prosecution.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Beldaur
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73841 of 2025(2) dt.18-11-2025 3/3 P. S. Case No.189 of 2025, G.R. No.1790 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T