Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7461/2018bail granted

Ranjeet Mishra @ Nanhe Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-07Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7461 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2015 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ranjeet Mishra @ Nanhe Mishra, son of Manindra Mishra, resident of Village Deokuli, P.S. Bahadurpur, District - Darbahanga ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Girish Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Smt Renu Kumari (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 07-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier thrice rejected vide order dated 27.06.2016, 15.03.2017 and 06.09.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 17810 of 2016, Cr. Misc. No. 11726 of 2017 and Cr. Misc. No. 42631 of 2017 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 07.01.2015, nothing has been recovered from his possession and the police obtained signature of the petitioner on plain paper. The trial has not been concluded within the time given by this court i.e. within three months and up till now cognizance has not been taken.

The learned A.P.P. submits that in spite of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7461 of 2018(2) dt.07-02-2018 2/2 direction given by this court the trial has not been started. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani, in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 07 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T