← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7055/2018rejected

Mantu Sahani @ Mantun Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-21Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7055 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-698 Year-2016 Thana- AHIAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Mantu Sahani @ Mantun Sahni, S/o Suresh Sahani, Resident of VillageShekhpur Dhab, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Chandra Shekhar Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Dr. Rabindra Kumar (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 21-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail which was earlier rejected vide order dated 09.05.2017 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 17999 of 2017, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 09.11.2016, up till now charge has not been framed and as such in near future the trail is not likely to be concluded. The confessional statement of the petitioner has got no evidentiary value in the eye of law and, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner shot Irshad and Irshad stated about the occurrence to his father and others before his death.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7055 of 2018(2) dt.21-02-2018 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer of the bail, again prayer of the bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 698 of 2016 (S.Tr. No. 659 of 2017) pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge - 8th, Muzaffarpur.

However, the learned trail Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible preferably within nine months, from date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T