Vinod Kumar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13284 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -115 Year- 2017 Thana -BARURAJ District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Vinod Kumar Singh, S/o Late Ranjeet Singh,

2. Ajay Kumar Singh S/o Late Indradeo Narain Singh, Both R/o VillagePhulwariya, P.S.- Baruaaj, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.

3. Ashok Pandy S/o Anant Pandey , R/o Village- Siswan, P.S.- Haruraj, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-04-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Baruraj P.S.Case no.115 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 353 & 153A of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with the other accused persons were pelting stone and created obstruction in Muharram procession.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that though they are named but no specific allegation has been attributed against them.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13284 of 2018 (2) dt.05-04-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ms. Pirti Kumari, J.M. Ist class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Baruraj P.S.Case no.115 of 2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T