Arunendu Kumar Anupam @ Arunendu Kumar @ Arnendu Kumar Anupam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81299 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2020 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada ====================================================== Arunendu Kumar Anupam @ Arunendu Kumar @ Arnendu Kumar Anupam Son of Shivdani Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Hdsha, P.S. - Hisua, District- Nawada, ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Samanti Devi, Resident of Bela, P.S. Hisua, District Nawada ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvarda, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-04-2025 Heard Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rajendra Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvarda, learned counsel for the Informant.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 133 of 2020, F.I.R. dated 28.04.2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the First Information Report, the informant alleged that petitioner along with others had withdrawn money from her account at C.S.P, Tungi without her consent.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81299 of 2024(4) dt.17-04-2025 2/3 petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is the proprietor of C.S.P and it has come during investigation that the informant has filed a withdrawal slip on the basis of withdrawal slip of the informant the amount in question has been withdrawn by the informant herself and no other material has come during the investigation which suggest the involvement of petitioner in the present occurrence.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Nawada in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 133 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81299 of 2024(4) dt.17-04-2025 3/3 i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T