Jogindar Sada v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75619 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-235 Year-2025 Thana- ALOULI District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.
Jogindar Sada S/o Bhaglu Sada Resident of Village- Ratnaha, P.O and P.SAlouli, Distt.- Khagaria 2.
Manju Sada @ Manju Devi W/o Yogindra Sada Resident of VillageRatnaha, P.O and P.S- Alouli, Distt.- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Leela Devi W/o Etawari Sada R/o ward no. 2, P.s.- Alouli, Distt.- Khagaria ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dhananjay Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Alouli P.S. Case No. 235 of 2025, instituted for the offences under Sections 140(3), 140(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that accused persons named in the F.I.R., including the petitioners, assaulted the informant's husband by means of lathi and danda and kidnapped him forcefully.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75619 of 2025(3) dt.02-02-2026 2/3 the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case only on suspicion. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 06.06.2025 and have no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners. He further submitted that the dead body of the victim has been recovered from the ditch on the basis of confessional statement of petitioners. After investigation I.O of this case submitted Charge-sheet under Sections 115(2), 352, 140(1), 103(1), 238/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners is, hereby, rejected.
8. Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
9. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to renew the prayer for grant of bail before the Trial Court if the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75619 of 2025(3) dt.02-02-2026 3/3 trial is not concluded within a period of five months from today. If any such application is filed before the learned court below, the court concerned shall consider the same on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T