Sanjay Bhuiyan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68925 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2019 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== SANJAY BHUIYAN Son of Ram Lal Bhuiyan Resident of Village- Main Bigha, P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kamlendra Pd. Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anita Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 06-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
Petitioner is in custody in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 112 of 2019 for the offence under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dain Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation of assault against the petitioner and 12 others co-accused. He further submits that out of 12 four persons eight have been granted bail either anticipatory bail or regular bail.
The petitioner is in custody since 22.05.2019. Considering the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, and the allegation against this petitioner is general
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68925 of 2019(3) dt.06-02-2020 2/2 and omnibus, the Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, let the petitioner, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Fifty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 112 of 2019.
The trial court is directed to expedite the hearing of trial and conclude the same within a maximum period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In the event, the petitioner is found delaying the trial, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U T