Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12649/2018bail granted

Seikh Mohammad Ali v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-03-07Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12649 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2017 Thana- ROUH District- Nawada ====================================================== Seikh Mohammad Ali S/o Sheikh Ladla, R/o 82/B, Rafi Ahmad, Kidwai Road, P.S.- Park Street, District- Kolkatta, 13 (24 Paragna, W.B.). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Shabnam Ara W/o Seikh Md. Ali, D/o Afroj Ahmad, R/o 82/B, Rafi Ahmad, Kidwai Road, P.S.- Park Street, District- Kolkata (24 Pargna, W.B.) and presently R/o Village- Marui, P.S.- Roh, District- Nawada. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. MD. ARIF, APP For opposite party No.2 :

Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 313, 498A, 354, 506, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture and assault upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 12.12.2017 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge sheet has been submitted

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12649 of 2018(2) dt.07-03-2018 2/2 in this case. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. IV, Nawada in connection with Roh P.S. case No.30 of 2017.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T