Ranjan Chaurasia v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69263 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2019 Thana- TEGHRHA DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== RANJAN CHAURASIA Son of Late Ratan Chaurasia Resident of Village - Barauni - 3, Ward No. 1, P.S.- Teghra, Distt - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kumar Sinha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s:

Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 05-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 448, 506, 341, 323, 324, 307 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 173 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute who are gotiyas and there is case and counter case between the parties. The petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the informant with iron rod but in any event the injuries are simple in nature. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69263 of 2019(3) dt.05-03-2020 2/2 petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 173 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T