Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74930 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-323 Year-2022 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Mukesh Kumar Son Of Sumay Yadav R/O Village- Tetar, P.S.- Atri, DistrictGaya 2.

Ravi Yadav @ Ravi Shankar Yadav Son Of Suraj Dev Yadav R/O VillageTetar, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya 3.

Dharamveer Kumar @ Kavi @ Kavi Yadav Son Of Suraj Dev Yadav R/O Village- Tetar, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya 4.

Ramesh Kumar Son Of Shivnandan Yadav R/O Village- Tetar, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya 5.

Abhishek Kumar @ Monu @ Monu Kumar Son Of Ramashish Yadav R/O Village- Tetar, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya 6.

Shivdahin Sipahi @ Randhir Kumar Son Of Ramanand Prasad @ Ramanind Prasad R/O Village- Tetar, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manisha Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.

As per the prosecution case, all the accused persons with arms entered into the house of the informant and assautled the nephew of informant with intention to kill hum. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74930 of 2022(2) dt.04-02-2023 2/2 case. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He further submits that no person was injured in the present case. He further submits that petitioners have got criminal antecedents as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposes for prayer for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that there is previous enmity between the parties which is clear from the FIR itself, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Atri P.S. Case No.323/2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T