Upendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75632 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-175 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKAI District- Jamui ====================================================== Upendra Yadav Chotho alias Chotho Yadav alias Chatho Yadav Village Guriyadih, P.S. Chakai, District Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 24-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 175 of 2025, dated 30.07.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118(1), 303(2), 352 & 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and other co-accused persons had been abusing the tractor driver of the informant and when the informant forbade him for doing so they assaulted the informant with spade causing a number of injuries to him.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75632 of 2025(2) dt.24-11-2025 2/3 been implicated in the present case. Informant and his family members assaulted the petitioner and his family members and also abused the wife of co-accused Ramotar Yadav by calling her witch. The injury sustained by the informant is also simple in nature. Learned counsel further submits that the informant tried to give the case a serious colour though there is no serious injury. There is counter version and one Kaileshwari Devi has filed one Chakai P.S. Case No. 176 of 2025 against the persons of informant side. The petitioner is in custody since 31.07.2025 and charge-sheet has been submitted. Petitioner is having antecedent of two cases and he is on bail in both the cases.

5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the period of custody of the petitioner and submission of chargesheet, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of court of learned J.M., First Class, Jamui/concerned court, in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75632 of 2025(2) dt.24-11-2025 3/3 175 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.. and other following conditions: (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial Court.

(iii) In case of non-appearance of the petitioner on single date or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Ranjeet/- U T