Ashok Bind @ Ashok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67985 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2018 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== ASHOK BIND @ ASHOK KUMAR Son of Sri Bideshi Bind Resident of Pandui Tola, Beldari Bigha, P.S.- Paras Bigha, Distt - Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Tilak Sao For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rina Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-11-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of her arrest in connection with Parash Bigha P.S. Case No. 116 of 2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304 (B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per F.I.R petitioner happens to be husband in a case under Section 304 (B) of the I.P.C. There is allegation of demand of motorcycle and for that killing the deceased and disposed of her dead body.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that later on a compromise petition has been filed before the learned Court below stating that due to some confusion he has filed this present case. Further submission is that after compromise informant has also married his second daughter with the petitioner and they are living peacefully. It has also
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67985 of 2019(3) dt.19-11-2019 2/2 been submitted that considering the same parents -in- law have been granted anticipatory by a coordinate Bench of this Court bail vide order dated 16.01.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 80188 of 2018.
On the other hand learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner stating that petitioner happens to be husband of the deceased and allegation of demand of dowry is against the petitioner.
Having heard both sides, in view of the allegation as discussed above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, however, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court below and make prayer for regular bail which shall be considered on the basis of material available on record as well as submission as made above.
With the aforesaid, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) T.Kr./- U T