Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8182/2018rejected

Ranvir Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-03-28Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8182 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -77 Year- 2017 Thana -MANSI District- KHAGARIA ======================================================

1. Ranvir Singh S/o Jhaksu Singh, R/o Village- Saidpur, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Asharaf Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-03-2018 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. Petitioner, already in custody since 21.6.2017, seeks bail in Mansi PS Case No. 77 of 2017 registered under Section 307/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The allegation in brief is that the petitioner shot on the head of the informant's son causing injury to him and it is alleged that the petitioner used to create terror invariably by opening fire. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the injury was not caused by the petitioner as cross firing was going on between the petitioner and one Mithlesh Singh so the shot fired by Mithlesh Singh caused injury to informant's son and eight criminal antecedents against the petitioner relate to the dispute with Mithlesh Singh.

Whereas learned Counsel for the informant and the State submit that there is specific allegation against the petitioner of shooting on the head of the informant's son causing injury and there are 14 criminal antecedents against the petitioner some of which were suppressed by the petitioner and the cases were lodged by

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8182 of 2018 (4) dt.28-03-2018 various persons.

Having considered the said facts and circumstances, especially the specific accusation against the petitioner as well as criminal antecedents, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and preferably conclude the same within a year, if not concluded the petitioner may renew prayer of bail.

(Arun Kumar, J) Snkumar/- U T