Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3636/2018bail granted

Vikash Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2018-01-24Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3636 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -168 Year- 2017 Thana -KARAHGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Vikash Sah Son of Sri Kapildeo Sah Resident of village- Karagahar, P.S.- Karagahar, District- Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sir Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-01-2018 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was disposed of vide order dated 21.09.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46596 of 2017, with direction to the court below that once charge-sheet is submitted in this case and if there is nothing against the petitioner, he shall release the petitioner on bail to his own satisfaction. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that even after investigation final form has been submitted against the petitioner not finding the allegation true, however, in spite of that cognizance was taken. Further petitioner has been in custody since 19.07.2017 and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3636 of 2018 (2) dt.24-01-2018 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Karagahar P.S. Case No. 168 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T