Jitendra Kumar @ Jalo v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74971 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar @ Jalo S/O Ravindra Prasad R/o Vill- Chakway, P.S.- Warisaliganj, Dist- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sudish Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2026 Heard Mr. Sudish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Nawada Cyber P.S. Case No. 82 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 05.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 111, 61(2) of B.N.S.

3. The case relates to recovery of Mobile, A.T.M., Passbook and other articles.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis of confessional statement of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74971 of 2025(3) dt.12-01-2026 2/3 co-accused person namely Nitesh Kumar and recovery has been made from the possession of co-accused Nitesh Kumar and except the confessional statement of co-accused person, no other cogent material has come during investigation to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries three more cases other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that out of three cases, the petitioner has been acquitted in two cases and in one case he is on bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused person and recovery has been made from co-accused Nitesh Kumar, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nawada Cyber P.S. Case No. 82 of 2025, subject to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74971 of 2025(3) dt.12-01-2026 3/3 conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

Ibrar//- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T