← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75683/2025disposed

Sudarshan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-17Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75683 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2025 Thana- KADIRGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Sudarshan Ram S/O Luvkush Ram R/O Vill.-Kushvan, Bir, P.S-Dhanarua, Dist- Patna, Pin- 804451.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Meena Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-11-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. It is further submitted that petitioner came to be implicated based on the confessional statement of co-accused, namely, Mukesh Kumar in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value in the eye of law. It is next submitted that petitioner is not the owner of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75683 of 2025(2) dt.17-11-2025 2/3 motorcycle but Mukesh Kumar falsely stated before the police that he had sold the motorcycle to the petitioner but then no documentary evidence in support of the same was produced.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,00/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 10 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned trial court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail application in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if it is found on verification that petitioner is a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75683 of 2025(2) dt.17-11-2025 3/3 person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T