Sumanjay Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3932 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -633 Year- 2016 Thana -JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE DistrictJEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Sumanjay Kumar son of Sri Bindi Prasad resident of village - Lalse Bigha, Police Station - Kako in the district of Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Smt. Lajwanti Bharti @ Shilpa Kumari wife of Sumanjay Kumar and daughter of Sri Shyam Kishore Das resident of Mohalla - Ambedkar Nagar, Police Station - Jehanabad in the district of Jehanabad. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajkishore Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case instituted under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 354 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of D.P. Act.

The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3932 of 2018 (2) dt.19-01-2018 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No.633/2016 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T