Sonu Kumar @ Gabbar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82906 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2024 Thana- BUNIYAD GANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Sonu Kumar @ Gabbar Singh S/O Late Sudhir Singh R/O Vill.- Sadipur, P.SBuniyadganj, Dist.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Mazharul Hassan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 130 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant was returning from his fields and at that time Bablu Singh, Sonu Kumar (petitioner) and Raj Kumar started abusing and assaulting him with iron rod. There is specific allegation against this petitioner that he has assaulted with iron rod on the head of the informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82906 of 2024(3) dt.10-01-2025 2/2
4. During course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is also a counter version of this case and in that case the wife of the petitioner and Bablu Singh have received injuries.
5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner and stated that from perusal of the injury report it is clear that the informant has received three injuries on his person. The injury received by him on his head is grievous.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, the present bail application stands rejected.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T