← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77627/2023allowed

Manoj Kumar Singh @ Jai Singh @ Jaiji Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-10Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77627 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2023 Thana- ARA MUFFSIL District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Manoj Kumar Singh @ Jai Singh @ Jaiji Singh S/O Late Raj Kumar Singh R/O Village- Khajuriya, P.S- Ara Mufasil, Distt.- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akash Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 10-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 304, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, father of the informant is said to have been died by electric current which has been fenced around the pond intentionally by co-accused Suraj Kumar Singh. This petitioner along with others is also involved in fencing the live electric wire.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The informant and the petitioner are co-villager and there is land dispute between them due to which he has falsely been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77627 of 2023(3) dt.10-01-2024 2/2 implicated in this case. No specific overt-act attributed to the petitioner. The specific allegation is against co-accused Suraj Kumar Singh, with whom the petitioner is said to have conspired. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 13.7.2023.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody period of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge him on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Ara (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 297 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VII, Bhojpur at Ara.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T