← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81102/2024allowed

Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-29Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81102 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2024 Thana- MOHANIYA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.

Jyoti Kumari 2.

Neha Kumari Both are D/O Sanjay Sah R/O Village- Naraura, P.S- Mohania, Distt.- Kaimur (Bhabua).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar No 13, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 364/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and during course of investigation Section 302 and 201 was also added.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the son of the informant namely, Anil Kumar Goswami was missing from the night of 28.05.2024. The informant has stated in his FIR that the petitioner Jyoti Kumari was on talking terms with the son of the informant. It has been suspected that she had kidnapped and killed the son of the informant. After some days the dead body of the son of the informant was recovered.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81102 of 2024(3) dt.29-01-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that during course of investigation only the confessional statement of both the petitioners is there in diary. Except this confessional statement, there is nothing against these petitioners. The petitioners are girls of clean antecedent. They are in judicial custody since 31.05.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each of them with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court of ACJM-1st Mohania, District-Kaimur (Bhabhua) in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No.316 of 2024.

7. Accordingly, the present bail application stands allowed.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T