Ranvijay Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75503 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2019 Thana- AWTARNAGAR District- Saran ====================================================== Ranvijay Singh S/O Om Prakash Singh Resident of Dhanaura, Kothia, P.O. - Awtarnagar, P.S - Awtarnagar, District -Saran, Bihar - 841216. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Chandan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-12-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 379, 324, 326, 302 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. It is next submitted that similarly situated co-accused Balbir Kumar Singh @ Balvir Singh and Ranvir Kumar Singh @ Ranvir Singh had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.63714 of 2025 and the same was allowed by an order dated 15.09.2025, thus based on parity seeks anticipatory bail. It is also submitted that police after threadbare investigation had
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75503 of 2025(2) dt.23-12-2025 2/3 submitted final form exonerating the petitioner of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, but then, the learned Magistrate took cognizance differing with the police report. It is next submitted that similarly in the case of Balbir Kumar Singh and Ranvir Kumar Singh final form was submitted and based on cognizance they were apprehending their arrest, hence had moved this Court seeking anticipatory bail which was allowed as recorded herein above. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence.
4. Learned A.P.P. is not in a position to rebut the said submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Awtar Nagar P. S. Case No.148 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75503 of 2025(2) dt.23-12-2025 3/3
6. The application stands allowed.
7. However, it is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner after his release is trying the delay the framing of charge or after framing of charge is trying to delay the trial in both the conditions, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T