Ramagya Ray @ Ramagya Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74932 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2022 Thana- CHHAURADANO District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Ramagya Ray @ Ramagya Prasad Yadav Son Of Gopi Ray R/V- Dharhari, P.S.- Chhauradano, District- East Champaran 2.

Awadhesh Ray @ Awadhesh Kumar Son Of Ramagya Ray @ Ramagya Prasad Yadav R/V- Dharhari, P.S.- Chhauradano, District- East Champaran 3.

Rakesh Rai @ Rakesh Prasad Yadav Son Of Ramagya Ray @ Ramagya Prasad Yadav R/V- Dharhari, P.S.- Chhauradano, District- East Champaran 4.

Guddu Ray @ Guddu Kumar Son Of Ramagya Rai @ Ramagya Prasad Yadav R/V- Dharhari, P.S.- Chhauradano, District- East Champaran 5.

Suga Devi Wife Of Ramagya Ray @ Ramagya Prasad Yadav R/V- Dharhari, P.S.- Chhauradano, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 23-01-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 1 has been arrested by the police, therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is granted.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with regard to petitioner no. 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State for consideration of bail with regard to rest of the petitioners.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74932 of 2022(2) dt.23-01-2023 2/3 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant by means of leg, fat and danda and snatched Rs. 10,000/- from his packet.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74932 of 2022(2) dt.23-01-2023 3/3 in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 215 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T