Awadhesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80249 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-368 Year-2021 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Awadhesh Kumar, Son of Late Jaykisun Mahto, Resident of Village- Bela Rampur, PS- Makhdumpur, Distt.- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Nityanand Neeraj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Kanhiya Kishor, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 30-07-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S.T. No. 227/22 arising out of Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 368 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections 302, 201, 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.
3. The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 30.08.2024.
4. The allegation against petitioner is to commit murder of his wife aged about 42 years.
5. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that out of domestic violence, the wife of petitioner committed suicide in Jamuna river. In support of his submission, he took shelter of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80249 of 2024(7) dt.30-07-2025 2/3 postmortem report, where cause of death categorically mentioned as "Cardio Respiratory failure due to Asphyxiation because of drowning in water". It is also pointed out that no external injuries were found upon deceased, suggesting prima facie that she was not assaulted physically soon before the occurrence. It is further submitted that nothing transpired during investigation, which may suggest that the act of petitioner was so active or direct which forced his wife to commit suicide. It is submitted that admittedly dead body was recovered from an open place and not from the matrimonial house of the petitioner. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that the petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and moreover, investigation of this case is already completed, for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.
6. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and by taking note of postmortem report, where cause of death appears drowning, coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already submitted, where petitioner remains in custody since 30.08.2024, accordingly, petitioner above named, is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80249 of 2024(7) dt.30-07-2025 3/3 directed to be released on bail in connection with S.T. No. 227/22 arising out of Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 368 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J. 3rd, Jehanabad/concerned Court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C./Section 480(3) of BNSS.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) veena/- U T