Manish Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.220 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -11 Year- 2017 Thana -SC/ST District- KHAGARIA ======================================================
1. Manish Sharma, son of Chamru Sharma, resident of Village- Mathurapur, P.S.- Town (Khagaria), District- Khagaria.
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Dronacharya For the Respondent/s : Smt Usha Kumari No-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the "SC/ST Act") against the refusal of prayer for regular bail by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Khagaria in Khagaria SC/ST P.S. Case No. 11 of 2017 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 379, 427, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 3(i)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act.
The appellant and others allegedly came to the house of the informant. First asked for the whereabouts of the husband of the informant and thereafter abused and assaulted. Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that no part of the occurrence took place within public
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.220 of 2018 (3) dt.12-02-2018 2/2 view. The parties are agnates, in past also criminal cases were lodged by the informant and others. The appellant is in custody since 09.12.2017.
Hence, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, subject to the condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.
Accordingly, this appeal stands allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T