Vikash Paswan v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4665 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -437 Year- 2017 Thana -HARSIDHI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Vikash Paswan, Son of Punyadeo Paswan, Resident of Village- Matiyariya Araji Nanhakar, P.O. and P.S.- Harsidhi, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Mamta Devi, Wife of Bikash Paswan, R/o Matiyaria, Araji Nanhkar, P.O. & P.S.- Harsidhi, Dist- E. Champaran.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha For the Informant :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar No. 7, Advocate.

Mr. Anant Kuamr Mishra, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-01-2018 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State as well as learned counsel for the informant.

The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Harsidhi P.S.Case No. 437 of 2017 GR No. 7093 of 2017 registered under Sections 341, 323, 498A and 504/34 of the Indian penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Submission is that petitioner had married to his own village girl who had fallen love with him so there is no question of demand of any dowry in such situation after lapse of five years and the petitioner is in custody since 18.11.2017. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, namely, Vikash Paswan is directed to be released on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4665 of 2018 (2) dt.30-01-2018 2/2 bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 437 of 2017.

(Arun Kumar, J) Sujit/- U T