← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./80554/2023allowed

Pankaj Kumar Sahni @ Tinku Sahni @ Tink Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-18Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80554 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2021 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== PANKAJ KUMAR SAHNI @ TINKU SAHNI @ TINK SAHNI son of Ramprasad Sahni Village- Mahadev Math Ps- Rosera Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhav Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Rita Verma, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, all the accused persons including the petitioner are said to have assaulted the informant's side brutally with deadly weapons due to which they sustained several injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80554 of 2023(2) dt.18-12-2023 2/2 general and omnibus in nature. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. It is further submitted that after investigation, the police have filed the final form against the petitioner, but differing from the final form, learned Court below took cognizance against him. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as the police have filed the final form against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 166 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T