Rubi Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78510 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2019 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria ====================================================== RUBI DEVI W/o Late Deepak Kumar R/o village- Bhagat Tola, Mathurapur, P.S. and District- Khagriya ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satyendra Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 16-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State as also learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner in this case is seeking regular bail in connection with Khagaria P.S. Case No. 47 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that save and except the confessional statement of the petitioner, there is no other material to connect her with the present case. The petitioner happens to be the wife of the deceased.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State jointly submit that the conspiracy between the petitioner and her Dewar- co-accused Avinah Kumar have been found behind the murder of the husband of this petitioner and in course of investigation it has revealed that this petitioner has illicit

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78510 of 2019(3) dt.16-01-2020 2/2 relationship with her dewar and they have planned to murder the deceased. The call details of the mobile of this petitioner and the coaccused Avinash Kumar also shows that Avinash Kumar who is serving in Delhi had come to the place of occurrence on the alleged date of occurrence and had talks with this petitioner on several occasions for comparatively long time and further the investigation has revealed that on the basis of the confessional statement of this petitioner the weapons used in killing the husband of the petitioner have been recovered.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the materials available in the case diary which has been brought to the notice of this Court as stated hereinabove, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

Let the trial be expedited.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T