Basant Chouhan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68221 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2019 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Basant Chouhan, Son of Brahm Dev Chauhan, Resident of Village - Mohabbatpur, P.S.- Sherghati, District- Gaya, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bachan Jee Ojha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 98 of 2019, registered under Sections 302, 394 and 397/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would appear from the FIR that on the basis of Fradbeyan of informant, Dinesh Singh, Madanpur P.S. Case No. 98 of 2019 was instituted against unknown but in course of investigation, the name of the petitioner has surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused, Govind Kumar Yogi @ Goswami and thereafter, Rs.10,000/- is said to be recovered from the house of the petitioner. It is further submitted that co-accused, Govind
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68221 of 2019(3) dt.24-02-2020 2/2 Kumar Yogi @ Goswami, has already been granted privilege of bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.02.2020 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 62095 of 2019 and petitioner is in custody since 03.06.2019.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 98 of 2019. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T