Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69127 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2019 Thana- RAJGIR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Vishal Kumar Son of Kanwar Resident of Village-Naya Tola, Jurabganj, Police Station-Kodha, District-Katihar ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar No 7, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is an accused in a case registered for offence under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 414/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Acting on a tip off, police intercepted some persons including the petitioner near the State Bank of India branch at Rajgir. On search, mobile phone, master key etc. were recovered from the petitioner.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case as nothing incriminating was recovered from his conscious possession. Petitioner is in custody since 15.5.2019. Similarly situated coaccused Ganit Yadav and Pintu Kumar have already been allowed bail by different benches of this Court vide orders dated 13.1.2020 and 11.12.2019, passed in Cr.Mis.No. 71454/2019 & 71290/2019 respectively.

In view of the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69127 of 2019(3) dt.29-01-2020 2/2 Magistrate, Biharsharif, Nalanda in Rajgir Police Station Case No. 183 of 2019, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T