Gito Ravidas @ Gita Ravidas @ Jeeto Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75749 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2025 Thana- HALSI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.
Gito Ravidas @ Gita Ravidas @ Jeeto Ravidas Son of Chedi Ravidas All are Resident of Village - Thekahi, P.S.- Halsi, District - Lakhisarai. 2.
Daso Ravidas Son of Anik Ravidas @ Chande Ravidas All are Resident of Village - Thekahi, P.S.- Halsi, District - Lakhisarai. 3.
Pramod Ravidas Son of Chande Ravidas @ Chando Ravidas All are Resident of Village - Thekahi, P.S.- Halsi, District - Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md Irshad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 24-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. In the present case, the petitioners seek bail in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 171 of 2025, dated 03.07.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 109(1), 351(2) & 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. As per prosecution case, the petitioners and other co-accused persons armed with iron rod and pistol surrounded the son of the informant and assaulted him with intention to kill him.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75749 of 2025(2) dt.24-11-2025 2/3 petitioners submit that petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case and no occurrence as alleged as ever taken place. In the F.I.R., it is apparent that the petitioners and informant are co-villagers and some quarrel took place between the children and son of the informant received injuries which are lacerated wound on the left side of forehead 5 cm x 1⁄4 cm x skin deep and the other lacerated wound is on the left side of eyebrow 3cm x 1⁄4 cm x skin deep, apart from tenderness and abrasion. However, linear undisplaced fracture of nasal bone on right side is found and for this reason, injury is stated to be grievous. Thus, most of the injuries are simple in nature. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have antecedent of one case in which they are on bail whereas petitioner no. 3 has no criminal antecedent. Petitioners are in custody since 31.08.2025 and charge-sheet have been submitted.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties, considering nature of injury, submission of charge-sheet and period of custody of the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, is directed to be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75749 of 2025(2) dt.24-11-2025 3/3 released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, /concerned court, in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 171 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.. and other following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners.
(ii) The petitioners will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial Court.
(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioners will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Ranjeet/- U T