Md. Imaran v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2645 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7594 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.
Md. Imaran Son of Late Shaikh Irfan, Resident of Village - Rupavhali, P.S.- Parbatta, District-Khagaria.
2.
Md. Noman Son of Late Shaikh Irfan, Resident of Village - Rupavhali, P.S.- Parbatta, District-Khagaria.
3.
Md. Ali Emam Son of Late Shaikh Irfan, Resident of Village - Rupavhali, P.S.-Parbatta, District-Khagaria.
4.
Mahbub Ali Son of Late Shaikh Irfan, Resident of Village - Rupavhali, P.S.- Parbatta, District-Khagaria.
5.
Shaikh Musa Son of Late Shaikh Abul Hassan, Resident of Village - Rupavhali, P.S.-Parbatta, District-Khagaria.
6.
Shaikh Salauddin Son of Late Shaikh Rashan, Resident of Village - Rupavhali, P.S.-Parbatta, District-Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Principal Secretary, Urban Housing and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Commissioner Munger Division, Munger.
3.
The D.M. Cum Collector Khagaria 4.
The Additional Collector Khagaria 5.
The Sub-Divisional Officer Gogari, Khagaria 6.
The Circle Officer Parbatta, Khagaria (Sri Anshu Prasun) 7.
Sri Ramanand Prasad Singh Son of Late Aroga Singh Ex M.L.A. Parbatta (151), Village-Naga Gaon, P.S.- Parbatta, District-Khagaria. 8.
Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Son of Ramanand Prasad Singh M.L.A. Parbatta(151), Resident of Village-Naga Gaon, P.S.-Parbatta, District-Khagaria. 9.
The District Land Acquisition Officer, Khagaria ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mrigendra Pratap Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dhurjati Kumar Prasad (GP-14) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 04-04-2025 The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 7594 of 2021, which has
Patna High Court MJC No.2645 of 2022(3) dt.04-04-2025 2/2 stood dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 15.09.2022.
2.
The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the counsel for the petitioners had fallen ill suddenly and therefore, he could not attend the hearing of the case, when the case was called out for hearing on 15.09.2022, thus, a sympathetic view be taken and the aforesaid petition be restored to its original file.
3.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as also taking into account the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct for restoration of the aforesaid writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 7594 of 2021 to its original file. 4.
The present petition stands allowed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U