Rahul Kumar @ Saunti @ Kankatwa v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75854 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-659 Year-2018 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna ====================================================== RAHUL KUMAR @ SAUNTI @ KANKATWA, Son of Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Kumar Malakar, Resident of Village - Hilsa Bazar Mali Tola, P.S.- Hilsa, Distt.- Nalanda, at Present Mahulihalt In the house of Satish Ji, P.S.- Parsa Bazar, Distt.- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pramod Ban Bihari Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 27.09.2018 in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.659 of 2018 registered for the offence under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged recoveries were not from the conscious possession of the petitioner and have been saddled on his shoulders. It is further submitted that so far as other antecedents are concerned, he has already been granted bail.
Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case and also the period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75854 of 2019(2) dt.09-12-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.659 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:
(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, son, brother, sister and/or his wife.
(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.
(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T