Rajiv Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67728 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2019 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Rajiv Thakur Son of Harischandra Thakur, Resident of Village - Ajanoul, P.S.- Dalsinghsarai, District - Samastipur.

2.

Vipin Thakur Son of Kishundeo Thakur, Resident of Village - Ajanoul, P.S.- Dalsinghsarai, District - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Dalsinghsarai P.S. Case No.229 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 307, 447, 341, 323, 324, 379, 325, 504, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation has been made against petitioner no.1 to have caused grievous injury to the informant by farsa and so far petitioner no.2, he has caused injury by rod but it is simple in nature.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of petitioner no. 2, namely, Vipin Thakur is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67728 of 2019(3) dt.06-03-2020 2/2 within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dalsinghsarai, Samastipur in connection with Dalsinghsarai P.S. Case No.229 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

So far petitioner no.1 is concerned, his prayer for bail is rejected.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T