Sintu Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17118 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -38 Year- 2016 Thana -JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE DistrictJEHANABAD ====================================================== Sintu Kumar, Son of Rajnath Prasad, Resident of Village- Govindpur, Police Station- Chandauti in the district of Gaya. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sanju Kumari, Wife of Sintu Kumar, Daughter of Upendra Yadav, presently Resident of Village- Titai Bigha, Police Station- Makhdumpur in the district of Jehanabad.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Navin Sharma, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 06.02.2018 in a case for the offence registered under Section 498(A) of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17118 of 2018 (2) dt.27-03-2018 2/2 petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class-cumMunsif, Jehanabad, in connection with Complaint Case No. 38 of 2016.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T