Manoj Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.242 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -147 Year- 2016 Thana -UJIYARPUR District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================
1. Manoj Kumar Sah S/o Late Kailash Sah, R/o Village- Labahatta, P.S.- Warisnagar, District- Samastipur. ... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No 13, Adv. : Mr.Rohit Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Samastipur in connection with Ujiyarpur Police Station Case No.147 of 2016 registered under Sections 147,148,468,420,406,323 of the Indian Penal Code. Later on Section 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 was added.
The informant had deposited money in some pension scheme of non-banking company. The company refunded some of the amount. However, not the entire amount. Hence, the complainant found himself cheated. The appellant was an agent of the company. Appellant is in custody since 14.08.2017, he has got no criminal
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.242 of 2018 (3) dt.22-03-2018 antecedent.
Considering the aforesaid fact, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.
Accordingly, the appeal stands allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- U T