Sonu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74566 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2022 Thana- CHAND District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Sonu Paswan Son Of Guddu Paswan R/O Vill.- Dugauli, P.S.- Chand, Distt.- Kaimur At Bhabhua ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jitendra Kumar Giri For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 19-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Chand P.S. Case No. 80 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per allegation in the FIR, the informant alleged that her daughter was married with the petitioner in year of 2021 and thereafter, the petitioner along with his family members subjected her to cruelty due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand. Ultimately, on 31.3.2022 the informant came to that her daughter was burnt to death by the petitioner along with his family members. Thereafter, the present FIR has been lodged. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and committed no offence. The petitioner is husband of the deceased due to which he has falsely been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74566 of 2022(5) dt.19-07-2023 2/2 implicated in this case. As a matter of fact, the deceased caught fire while she was cooking food and due to this reason, she died. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and languishing in judicial custody since 1.4.2022.
Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail and submitted that the death of the informant's daughter was caused within seven year of her marriage. The petitioner is husband of the deceased upon whom the full responsibility to keep his wife well. Postmortem report annexed with the case diary, corroborates the prosecution case in which cause of death is opined due to burn injuries. It is further submitted the witnesses of this case have also supported the prosecution.
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.
The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as soon as possible.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T