Ashok Chaurasia And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9725 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-904 Year-2017 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria ======================================================

1. Ashok Chaurasia

2. Sanjay Chaurasia, both are sons of Late Mahadeo Chaurasia

3. Om Prakash Chaurasia

4. Rajesh Chaurasia

5. Umesh Chaurasia, The Petitioner Nos. 3 to 5 are sons of Ishwari Bhagat

6. Rajendra Chaurasia, S/o Bihari Bhagat

7. Dharo Chaurasia, S/o Late Anandi Chaurasia, All are R/o VillageNavtoliya Mathurapur, P.S. Khagaria, District- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Viveka NandSingh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners apprehend arrest in Khagaria P.S. Case No. 904 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 145,147,282,353 of the IPC.

In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners that they along with other accused persons blocked the road from bamboo sticks. It appears from para 3 to this petition that these petitioners have clean antecedent.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9725 of 2018(2) dt.20-02-2018 2/2 allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Khagaria P.S. Case No. 904 of 2017 to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, subject to condition as laid down u/S 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C.

with further conditions (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bonds of the petitioners and (3) if the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.