← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./83615/2023bail granted

Surendra Rai @ Sunil Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-09Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83615 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-357 Year-2022 Thana- SARAI District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

SURENDRA RAI @ SUNIL RAI SON OF LATE VILASH RAI RESIDENT OF RAGHOPUR, P.S. - RAGHOPUR, DISTRICT - VAISHALI 2.

AMITA DEVI WIFE OF SURENDRA RAI @ SUNIL RAI RESIDENT OF RAGHOPUR, P.S. - RAGHOPUR, DISTRICT - VAISHALI 3.

PINTU RAI SON OF SURENDRA RAI @ SUNIL RAI RESIDENT OF RAGHOPUR, P.S. - RAGHOPUR, DISTRICT - VAISHALI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhitabh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 363, 365 of the IPC. 3.

Allegedly, the petitioners along with other co-accused persons are said to have kidnapped the sister of the informant on gun point.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioners have been made accused in this case on the basis that they are the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83615 of 2023(2) dt.09-01-2024 2/2 father, mother and brother of Chintu Kumar, with whom the sister of the informant has married without the consent of the family. From the wedlock, the victim has been blessed with a baby, for which, the birth certificate has been enclosed at Annexure-2 of the bail petition. There is no specific overt act against the petitioners. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No.357 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T